Trump (1:17-cv-01597-CKK) was a lawsuit filed on Augand decided Januin the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.The suit sought to block Donald Trump and top Pentagon officials from implementing the proposed ban on military service for transgender people under the auspices of the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fifth. The facts speak less to a scandal and more, perhaps, to an attempt at a smear—one that finally, after months of clumsy maneuvering, is gaining speed.Trump and Epstein: Case 5:16-cv-00797-DMG-KS Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and.Jane Doe v. But even given Trump’s moderately disgusting track record with women, the fact is that a cadre of men have been shopping this Katie Johnson story around for nearly a year, while repeatedly refusing requests to interview the supposed victim.
5:16-Cv-00797-Dmg-Ks Download Mac DmgWhat "charges" are you talking about? Nothing in the two filed-then-withdrawn civil filings relates to the Florida Epstein criminal stuff. A few of those claims were outlined in a 1998 Variety article:They are articles written by reporters who investigated this thing as thoroughly as possible during the election.These filings were also discussed extensively here at DU at the time as well.Who is the accuser? It's not "Katie Johnson" since that was a pseudonym used in the filings - the first of which claimed her residence as an unoccupied house that was for sale at the time, and the owner knew nothing about it.If this is your first go-round, then you are going to have to at least learn the basic facts of the situation.You refer to "charges". Today, the Guardian’s Jon Swaine unearthed compelling evidence that “Taylor” is in fact a former Jerry Springer Show producer named Norm Lubow who has long been accused of (and denied) making outlandish claims about celebrities, sometimes under assumed names. Dmg Vs Attack Cased 5 16-cv-00797-dmg-ks Quartz Composer Download Mac Dmg.The prosecution worked with the defense to charge him with being a John, not an international sex trafficker, which he is, and the victims were lied to about the deal and the outcome, being lied to by their attorneys that federal charges would still be possible yet giving every other man involved immunity. And keep in mind that if 60 came forward, 200 are still out there, hiding in their shame.It was FIXED because the law was broken. Their lives have almost all been destroyed by the trauma, which is why the defense purposely did not tell them about the deal so they could not be present in court to detail in their own words the results of this sordid affair. And the thought of her being threatened if she came forward is ludicrous.why? Because Trump has no past history of mafia threat tactics?So tell me why he gets a pass for the other 15 year old girls he didn’t tie down but had sex with. Did the never trumpers make up ALL of them, many who had filed charges before Trump was a candidate? Yes, this one girl claims to have been forcibly raped.It’s about young girls in Florida and around the world being trafficked for sex. Nobody.NOBODY should be out of jail living on a private island after what he did, and those he did it with need to be in a cell forever right with him. I couldn’t let this go, and there should be no controversy to begin with. I can’t even believe I have to explain all of this, and I suggest you don’t respond to me, because frankly you justifying the exploitation of over 60 15 year old girls makes me not only angry and physically ill, but also leaves me wondering about your own motives.I make a point of not posting on anything controversial. Like Cohen working in cahoots with Stormy’s lawyer to get Trump, not Stormy, the best deal.![]() Acosta will have something to say - if he is able summoned to speak on the issue, maybe with a promise of prosecutorial immunity. (And there seems to be no evidence proving Epstein did such a thing.)Maybe Mr. If Epstein had been known as an international drug lord who liked to party, his associates might reasonably be suspected of doing drugs occasionally at those parties.But people do not get indicted or condemned on the basis of suspicion, however juicy the story might be, however tempting it might be to believe it.Moreover, it is at least possible that Trump, though basking in his reputation as a pussy-grabbing playboy, may indeed have had sense (if not decency) enough to leave children alone - even if Epstein had, for instance, offered him the services of 13 year old girls. Microsoft word for mac bookDistrict Court are not mentioned in the "miningawareness" article either, which is dated June 11, 2018.All three of these articles are about the April, 2016 CA lawsuit, which was filed as aThis lawsuit was dismissed because it was NOT a "civil rights" case.In September, 2016, the plaintiff filed a second lawsuit in New York District Court, alleging that both Epstein and Trump raped her at Epstein's NYC townhouse when she was 13.A few days later, she amended the suit because a witness came forward named "Joan Doe," who said she worked for Epstein at the time and that she WITNESSED THE RAPE!Like the plaintiff, Jane Doe, the new witness signed an affidavit in Federal Court,UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, that she did, indeed, "witness the rape of the 13-year-old girl by both Trump and Epstein."Now, if both Jane Doe and her witness, Joan Doe, are lying, the both could be sent to prison for 5 years. Why haven't The Media Covered It?"Grim gives two reasons "why the media haven't covered it"If you had been raped when you were only 13 by one of the most powerful men in the world, wouldn't you try to remain anonymous too?Especially after being warned that "if you tell anyone, your entire family will be killed!"2) "The accuser's public backers have been savaged in the press"The plaintiff, Katie Johnson, aka "Jane Doe" didn't then, and doesn't now have much money.When a couple of "backers" came forward to help her with her travel expenses etc., she did apparently, accept their help.One of these men, Steve Baer, is an outspoken Republican donor, who, at the time, hated Trump.The other backer is "a man who may or may not be named Al Taylor, but is more likely to be named Norm Lubow, and was apparently a former producer for "The Jerry Springer Show."If you care to, you can easily do a Google search and read both of these Huffpo articles.Regarding "Snopes.com".perhaps I went a little too far labeling this so-called "fact checking" website as a "right-wing disinfo website"However, Forbes Magazine did a piece on Snopes on December 22, 2016, titled:"The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers".when I reached out to David Milkkelson, the founder of Snopes, for comment, I fully expected him to respond with a lengthy email in Snopes' trademark point-by-point format, fully refuting each and every one of the claims in the Daily Mail article and writing the entire article off as '"fake news."It was with incredible surprise therefore that I received David's one-sentence response which read in it's entirety, "I'd be happy to speak with you, but I can only address some aspects in general because I'm precluded by the terms of a binding settlement agreement from discussing details from my divorce."This absolutely astounded me.Here was one of the world's most respected fact-checking organizations, soon to be an arbitrator of "truth" on Facebook, saying that it cannot respond to a fact checking request because of a secrecy agreement.In short, when someone attempted to fact check the fact checker, the response was the equivalent of "it's secret."On February 1, 2019, Snopes announced that it had ended it's fact-checking partnership with facebook.Court filings in New York Federal District Court by the plaintiff in September, 2016.The first case filed in CA was not a "civil rights" case, so it was dismissed.The second and third filings in N.Y. And has discussed this case on The Tom Hartmann Show"Donald Trump Is Accused Of raping A 13-Year-Old. Who knows?"the fact that NO major news outlet is touching this story because it has some holes."Do you not consider the Huffington Post a "major news outlet"?"Why The New Child Rape Case Filed Against Donald Trump Should Not Be Ignored"Lisa Bloom later became Katie Johnson's lawyer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTrevor ArchivesCategories |